A compelling analysis by the Geopolitical Economy Report sheds light on a narrative that points towards significant US involvement in this regime change, raising alarms about the broader implications for regional stability and sovereignty.

At the heart of this contention is the strategic ambition of the United States to establish a military base on St. Martin’s Island. Situated in the Bay of Bengal, this location offers a pivotal vantage point for projecting US power into both the Bay of Bengal and neighboring Myanmar. Such a base would not only enhance the US’s military footprint in the region but also serve as a critical node in its broader Indo-Pacific strategy. The establishment of this base, however, is not merely a matter of defense; it represents a tangible shift in regional power dynamics that could unsettle the delicate balance in South Asia.

Compounding this strategic move is the US’s alleged support for a color revolution in Bangladesh. Drawing parallels to the movements that have swept through Eastern Europe and Central Asia, the US has purportedly funneled funds through the National Endowment for Democracy to bolster opposition groups. This financial and logistical backing has empowered factions within Bangladesh to challenge the established government, fostering an environment ripe for political upheaval. The historical alliance between the US and right-wing opposition groups, particularly the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), underscores a pattern of external interference aimed at destabilizing democratically elected leaders.

The repercussions of such meddling are evident in the violent protests that have plagued the country. The US’s endorsement of these demonstrations amplified through media outlets like Netra News, has incited widespread unrest. Calls for “free and fair” elections have often come after the opposition has boycotted previous electoral processes, further delegitimizing the political framework and eroding public trust. This orchestrated chaos not only undermines the legitimacy of the government but also paves the way for a potential power vacuum that could spiral into prolonged instability.

Historical precedents lend credence to these allegations. The US has a documented history of supporting coups against leaders who stand in the way of its geopolitical interests - be it Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Manuel Noriega in Panama, or Imran Khan in Pakistan. These interventions, driven by strategic imperatives, often result in long-term regional instability and tarnish the US’s image as a proponent of democracy and self-determination.

The potential establishment of a US military base in Bangladesh is not an isolated ambition but part of a broader strategy to exert influence over key maritime routes and counterbalance rising powers in the region. This move, coupled with support for opposition groups, signals a concerted effort to reshape Bangladesh’s political landscape in favor of US interests. The ramifications of such actions extend beyond immediate political turmoil, posing significant threats to national sovereignty and regional harmony.

As Bangladesh grapples with the aftermath of Sheikh Hasina’s ousting, both domestic and international stakeholders must scrutinize the forces driving this change. The specter of external interference not only challenges the integrity of Bangladesh’s democratic institutions but also sets a dangerous precedent for other nations in the region. Upholding the principles of self-determination and resisting undue external influence is crucial for ensuring lasting peace and stability in South Asia.

The allegations of US involvement in Bangladesh’s regime change warrant serious consideration and robust dialogue. As the nation stands on the brink of potential instability, it is essential to address these concerns transparently and uphold the sovereignty of Bangladesh. Only through such vigilance can Bangladesh navigate its path toward a stable and prosperous future, free from the shadows of external manipulation.